| 2026-10-10 | Developing → Developing | homework #8 "Straight lines: weekend homework" loaded onto the tracker 10 Oct (set 9 Oct, due 11 Oct): 6 questions, 15 marks, on paper, at /exam/8 — substitution, gradient and start value from two points, scaffold withdrawn by Q5, rearranging 2y = 8x + 6. | standalone |
| 2026-10-09 | Developing → Developing | Homework set by parent on 9 Oct for the weekend of 10-11 Oct: 6-item handwritten sheet, non-calc, unaided, 15 marks (table of values; equation from start value and step; two points with x = 0; two points neither at x = 0 with the lines stated; the same in bare exam wording; gradient and start value from 2y = 8x + 6). Set, not yet answered. To be photographed and marked in the parent project. No status change. | standalone |
| 2026-10-09 | Developing → Developing | 9 Oct, cold, non-calc: line through (2, 5) and (6, 13), question worded 'work out the gradient, then substitute a point to find the start value': y = 2x + 1 first time in under 1 min, 1/1 unaided. No working written (replied 'in my head' when asked for a photo before marking). Same item as the 7 Oct paper (y = 2x + 2.5 then). Neither point at x = 0. Session 90. Retrieval outcome: correct. | standalone |
| 2026-10-08 | Developing → Developing | 8 Oct opener, cold, non-calc: line through (0, 2) and (4, 14), asked for gradient, equation and a check with x = 4. Wrote y = 3x + 2 first time with the check 4*3 + 2 = 14. Gradient working not written. 1/1 unaided; one point at x = 0. | session 88 |
| 2026-10-07 | Developing → Developing | Exam practice 7 Oct (test #7, attempt #15, timed) Q8: line through (2, 5) and (6, 13), she wrote 'y = 2x + 2.5', no working; 1/3. Gradient right and placed as the multiplier of x; intercept not found by substituting a point. Marking only: no status change. Retrieval outcome: incorrect. | standalone |
| 2026-10-06 | Secure → Developing | 6 Oct, non-calc, after 2 misses in the morning warm-up. Gradient from two points 2/2 unaided with lines ('4, 8/2'; '11 - 5 = 6, 6/3 = 2'). Equation from gradient and start value 0/2 first time: 'i don't know' on (0,3),(2,11); 'y = 5x + 2' for gradient 2, start 5, then 52 and 17 computed from it. Right only after counting along the line ('y = 4x + 3'; y = 2x + 5 chosen from two). One fresh unaided item in 'start at 1, add 6 for every x' wording: 'y = 6*x +1'. Last check 2 Sep. | session 77 |
| 2026-09-03 | Secure → Secure | 2 Sep starter: gradient 3 and y-intercept −4 read correctly from 2y = 6x − 8, though the rearranged line y = 3x − 4 was not written down first. | session 2 |