Currently Developing · last touched 2026-10-23
| When | Change | Evidence | Session |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-23 | Developing → Developing | 23 Oct: reader line on 3/3 quotations ('makes the reader feel uneasy/uneasy/weird') with the check naming it, second session running (21 Oct 3/3). No because-clause on any today. Still untested without the check named. | session 135 |
| 2026-10-21 | Gap → Developing | 21 Oct: fresh unseen tutor passage, three quotations, 10 min, unaided, named check 'all three have a reader line': 3 of 3 with a reader feeling and a because (alone, timid, rushed). Before it, 'swallowed' with a 'makes the reader' starter and 'pour' with none: 2/2 with reasons. Same-day paper 0/3. Effect half now lands when the check names it; at the developing bar. | session 129 |
| 2026-10-21 | Gap → Gap | paper #10 Q3: 3/6, loss=technique — no effect on the reader written for any of the three quotations although asked for each | session 125 |
| 2026-09-30 | Gap → Gap | Placement paper 30 Sep, language question: method identified in her own words ('giving the storm some human feters') with 0 effect attached and the term not used. 1 method, 0 effects. No status change from marking. | session 59 |
| 2026-09-29 | Not started → Gap | Correction (parent rule, 29 Sep): answered on and below the bar cannot stay notstarted → gap. 11 Sep: accepted 'personification' as a label only after the effect was found; 18 Sep: asked to name the method on 3 quotes from a real source, 0 named, feature list given instead. Never named unaided in 3 sessions. | standalone |
| 2026-09-18 | Not started → Not started | 18 Sep: asked to name the method before it was offered, on a real source; none named on any of 3 quotes. Third session without an independent method label. Feature list given instead ('lots of description, verbs and nouns, lots of commas'). | session 32 |
| 2026-09-11 | Not started → Not started | Found the effect first and then accepted 'personification' as the label for it, in that order. Spotted unprompted that 'clawed' and 'gnawed' are both animal verbs running through the same line — a pattern across the extract, not a single device. | session 20 |
No marked question has been recorded against this topic yet.